Would Isolationist Presidents Cause War?

Would the Borda Count Have Avoided the Civil War?

The election of 1860 was one of the most important and contentious elections in US history. It was also one of the most interesting. Four candidates from three different parties battled for the presidency and all four received a significant number of votes. We ask whether Lincoln’s victory was sound, or was it due to a fluke in the electoral system? Did a Lincoln win plausibly represent the wil...

The Influence of War and Party System Aging on the Ranking of Presidents

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...

Wars , Presidents and Popularity : The Political Cost ( s ) of War Re - examined

Extensive research demonstrates that war casualties depress incumbent popularity. The present study argues that analyses of the political costs of warfare should also account for the financial toll of wars since a) financial costs of wars are substantial, b) these costs are publicly observed and understood and c) fiscal policy affects incumbents' approval ratings. Empirical evidence based on US...

Presidents, Vice Presidents, and Death: Closing the Constitution's Succession Gap

Malignant pleural effusion: would the real cause please stand up?

Pleural effusions in patients with malignant disease are not invariably due to metastatic spread to the pleura and thus, they are not always incurable. For example, about 5% of patients with effusions due to lung cancer have subsequently been found to be operable and curable [1]. It is, therefore, important to assess the potential curability in all cancer patients with cytologically negative ef...